Remux vs 4k vs reddit Basically since remuxes with WEBDL DV metadata became a thing. I would like to build a server with ~50 TB of RAID storage to handle this with whatever If you had asked me a few months ago I would have said the Shield is over hyped and HDR looked shocking compared to the ATV 4K or indeed a half decent HTPC. No difference. The best IMO are VII, IX and RO with Ep III coming in 4th (overall score for PQ/HDR/Audio). When you say pixels I'm assuming you mean compression artifacts or banding? A blu-ray remux will always be higher quality than anything re-encoded. You’re Probabaly transcoding the video. The menus in Fen load twice as quick, and the widgets load 10x quicker if your using a skin. However, I only see the 2D Extended version of the film with a REMUX of that size (well, 36gb), so I'm guessing it wasn't the 3D version. Another big thing I've noticed for encode vs remux is aspect ratios. There are two types of remux. OLEDs can't produce a picture as bright as, say, a QLED. A full disk rip is everything, essentially like having an original disk For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit 4K remux is 80 gig. But what should I be looking for if I'm looking for compressed versus not compressed video files? Edit: I know nothing about file compression. This goes for 4K or 1080. If you are more of extras loving guy like deleted scenes or making of movie or any edited scenes etc then go for full Bluray. com has reviews up for 1-5 and RO. This is WAYYY too big for my little server (2-4TB right now). I'd recommend looking in your TV settings, if the brightness is too high this can be a reason on OLEDs. SDR rip. Blu-ray. The 1080p version is de-noised to high hell to look like Futurama or Family Guy that's done on a computer and not hand drawn on paper like that cartoon has been. I wonder if that could be the obstacle. I think the shadows might be a bit sharper but that's about it. As I've read that remux is like the best you can get as its directly from the likes of a bluray without any alterations just being put into a . Whereas, encodes have minimal buffering. The dynamic range will make a much bigger difference in picture appreciation for me than pure image. I just hope they get streaming up to snuff, if there's absolutely no difference between streaming and 4k blue ray and there's good streaming options I'm all for it, less storage easier to go about, like a paid plex server or something, but as of now I'm gonna keep going for 4k blu rays as well, I mean even normal blu rays + upscaling between the tv and blue ray player is leagues ahead of This post 4K HDR Movies: A Pirates Guide : Piracy (reddit. A lot of movies aren't real 4k. It's the little things like scratches on an outfit, coloring, lighting even hair texture looks a bit different. Many 4K WEB-DL's are bit-starved fake upscales with awful HDR grading so the Blu-ray version will be superior. So it has lost quality, if you want to go for the best use the REMUX version. I generally want my TV shows and movies to be around 8 mbps or so. none of the 2160p HDR flicks are Remux much smaller file sizes compared to Remux most releases are WEB H265 For example, a 2160p. Thanks for your assistance. Honestly, I can tell absolutely no difference between my 4K copy and the 1080p version. I don't notice much of a difference between 25gb 4k compressed or remux copies. It can work as a Media server with Plex, can be used for Games and of course for other Movie and Entertainment apps. When you remux something you take the original files or streams contained within the original multiplex and reorganise noob question, is there any difference in watching a downloaded 4k remux or a $300-400 uhd player with a $30 physical 4k bluray? Archived post. Reddit’s little corner for iPhone lovers (and some people who just mildly enjoy it) Members Online. REMUX vs 10bit HDR rips I don’t know why but sometimes 4K remux like tenet looks bad quality. The remux has finer detail, smoother and more uniform. m2ts, which includes extras and disc navigation. As for which is better a smaller 4K versus a larger 1080p, that would depend entirely on you having a 1080p TV/monitor vs 4K TV/monitor. Oh yeah at that point it's very nice having uhd terminal releases usually around 25% the size of a uhd remux, and on my setup, not any appreciable difference while maintaining HDR/atmos. For future better keep the 4k hdr remux. Don't do 4K yet. Who know you probably getting a hdr hardware in the future and dont have to redownlod the 4k hdr remux again. I can tell the difference depending on where I'm sitting from a 4k vs 1080p. Every movie is going to be different. You are right. It can upscale 1080p to 4K so beautifully. The 4k REMUX is better, you can see the grain of the paper they drew the cartoon on!!! Look at the curtain and the insane amounts of detail in the colour gradient. Q&A. HDR. 4k. A 1080p Blu-ray will have 2x+ the bitrate on average but it is also using an older an less efficient codec, it being H. And I cannot detect a difference either on my LG 77" CX OLED or 140" JVC 4K projector (or my 4K computer display for that matter) even when standing up close to the screen swapping back and forth really quick between the Remux and encode and pixel peeping. I thought pretty good deal. upscaled. I’d expect 4k remastered movies with cinema filters being added post production to be way bigger in file size. But the Shield has become far more consistent of late. For me its because of his encode quality vs the size. But it's still worth downloading the 4k version for the HDR. Your second example with the low bitrate is also not a remux. I always use strict with a 0 Crop now (if I encode anything) Compare Image quality with Screenshots directly. It became a game of too much work and not enough information. However if you’ve watched a lot of true 4K on a good set-up it won’t look impressive, IF, this is your first 4K it will look impressive. The 2nd one is in hdr but is 50GB while the 1st one is REMUX and 100GB. 7 mb/s the REMUX will have a much higher bits/pixel ratio and all things being equal would look better. It includes two cuts of the movie and lots of extras too. I did comparing tests with Remux, HDB internals, scene encodes and 5,6,7 GB 1080p HEVC encodes and all looks the same regarding to video quallity. The encodes in the 25-35Mbps range are awesome to me. The biggest difference would be seen between webdl and the remux as the webdl almost certainly doesn't have enough bitrate. These movies are typically around 40-60gb, or even larger I'm getting a new 4k tv + sound system and I wanted to rewatch some of my old favourites in the higher quality. I was thinking of purchasing the Series S instead of the Nvidia Shield. Compared to the Blu-ray, there was almost no film grain and the people looked really smooth and waxy. If you’re using a remux, both 1080p and 4K will be FAR better than what Netflix can deliver. A streaming service is trying to optimize bandwidth usage and overall customer satisfaction w/ quality. As others have said, HDR is probably the biggest benefit, so it depends mostly on if it’s a film that has a good HDR grade and/or a film that will benefit a lot from HDR. I’ve not seen it in 4k. Come and join us today! Remux is always best. Bottom line Fire TV Stick Max is on Fire OS 7 (Android 9), have a little more RAM and CPU, supports WiFi 6 and AV1 video codec, if you are on budget I think Stick 4K (2018) is your best option, but if you can afford a better device then get the Fire TV Cube (2nd Gen) and forget I have a 43in 4K TV that costs about $500 and S9 ultra that costed $1700, and I watched 15 minutes of Interstellar on both with 2 files, 1 is Remux that was about 70GB and then your average 20-25GB Blu-ray rip, so the total 60 minutes I spent helped me establish that I see or hear absolutely zero difference for "my" setup. I have a 65 inch 1080p screen, whats better for me 1080p remux or 2160p blu ray? As for quality, I doubt you will see a difference even on a 4K screen. I keep everything in 4K that comes in 4K. Good encodes crop the video to remove the black bars which means they can properly be viewed using plex, etc. My goal is to buy a NAS and to do my own library on it. I am trying to decide if I should buy the 4K HDR It means they’ve taken the video and audio from a 4K Bluray disc and converted it to mkv format without any re-encoding. I've been lurking in r/plex, r/hometheater, and r/homelab for a while, and I am looking for advice and resource recommendations on building a Plex setup that will give me 4k, HDR, super-saiyan, lossless or near-loss quality streams, possibly with the option to transcode down for remote users. So for example chapter For some reason when i watch 4K HDR Movies (Remux Movies with hardrive connected to Nvidia Shield) with Nvidia shield compare to connecting my Hardrive directly to my TV, the Nvidia Shield has a bit kind of downgrade in the picture quality, the Picture look a bit more blurier and the colours looks less pop out and less alive, did anyone tried to compare and got the same The 4K sets are basically nothing but the 4K movie and Blu-Ray movie with little extra. I'm weighing up whether to buy it digitally or get the 4K bluray, which I'd play in my Series X (not the most advanced 4K player, I know, but it's all I've got for now). this is just my personal opinions. Not to mention that 1080p means I let my tv or shield pro do some form of artificial upscaling There is no correct answer. So yes. Maybe all these companies use special software to make the file size smaller without losing quality. 1080p remux could be anywhere from 15gb-40gb. At this point, it looked like the real race was between 1080p remux and 1080p bluray rips. Audio and video are two different animals, but I generally look for the video that has the highest bitrate. Aspect Ratio is something to look out for. So I was wondering, is it really a big difference visually between a 4k remux and a I tried a Remux of The Last of Us vs an encode I did myself on AV1, then another I downloaded on H265. Choose a movie which is native 4k. Switching between the two, I could tell the streaming version was inferior amd was most likely a 4K upscale with possible AI added HDR metadata. My entire library is 4k UHD and 1080p BR rips. there's very little difference between the encodes and the source it was made from, though that is something that requires a bit more bitrate, so their encodes end up larger. If you inspect the armor of the guy in the back. That saidsome studios (like disney) make fake hdr which is just taking the 1080p bluray and adding a lut and metadata to trigger hdr which actually makes it look worse. Proper Encode = ~450MB If you need to save some space you should encode. you're asking what the difference between euros and eggs is. I certainly can tell the difference between an HDR vs. But I still see a significant difference between the UHD-BD and the regular BD. Maybe there's a smaller ISO with just the movie, but make sure the source file is labeled with 3D otherwise it's just a The Arrow blu-ray was actually produced from a 4K master, the UHD uses the same master but at full, native 4K resolution, with HDR and Dolby Atmos. My question was more for the shows/ movies that don’t have that. On the other hand, The biggest area I see quality problems is movies with lots of dark scenes as you really see the artifacts even with fairly good quality files. My majority of films are 4K REMUX so as much data as a 4K UHD disc. So I own the 4K Blu-ray and a very casual LCD-4K-TV. 265 encodings. While both could probably play the 4K remux equally well, the Shield is just so much easier to use and also super versatile in what you could use it for. Shout doesn't have 4K rights. There are quite a few apps out there to play remux files. I’d advise getting the remux, but if you’re looking for the absolute highest quality version of Apocalypse Now you might have better luck looking for the 200gb dcp remux or 1 tb 4k prores It still depends on the actual movie itself but that can cut your average 4k remux file size down about 30%. How much better is the perceived quality difference between the RD+ Torrentio files (usually float in the 4-7gb range) and the full Remux files? Or is the main difference in audio? Any insight would be great as I'm debating on getting a shield to do Remux files but only if I can download GoT as 4K Blu Ray Remux (with lossless Atmos, which I really appreciate) with 25 GB/Ep on UHD movies. 265 by modern streaming services so not an apples to apple comparison. I have a 4K HDR tv. If you have 4K, use it. How many bytes should that take up? Video has a "code" to say "all these pixels are the same damned color", at least figuratively speaking. An example I saw today was Handmaid’s Tale, all 3 seasons are on blu rays but also available as a 4k webrip. 03 GB. Plus, I wouldn't want a 4K Blu-ray based on their Blu-ray release with their revisionist color scheme. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Do it with a proper 4K TV. Although when I disconnect the homecinema, I have the same None. I personally think the 1080p remuxes look/sound better then a 4k non remux huge discussion here on it - most agree the UHD is the best its ever looked. 3 Mb/s IMAX 2160p WEB-DL bit rate: 16. If I direct connect an external hard drive with 4k remux file, can the Series View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Then you can decide if you want the lossless audio tracks a TrueHD & DTS-X tracks can be 4Mbps or more by themselves. Now Otherwise, 4K web-dl and 1080 remux can be very similar and you can’t really go wrong with either. They look pretty much the same. e. 1080p vs 4k playback on iPhone DLSS ultra perf 4K vs performance 1440p on 4K screen upvotes No. You just have to check the file size. Ideally i would want the 4k versions but how much of a difference is the blu ray vs the 4k for those that have watched both? If i can find a good deal on 4k ill for sure pick them up but for the price i felt like i couldn't pass them up. I do not know if this is right, but just wanted to know you guys's input on Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Old. 6 Mb/s Comparison of Tenet 4K vs Blu Ray 4K is 3840 x 2160 From a strict resolution standpoint, yeah its higher quality resolution. If you’re getting your movies from other sources, make sure you’re getting remux content. Non remuxes of both are between 3-15 gigs . In future you movie probably have no seeder to download if you delete the 4k hdr remux from your storage. If you have the storage space, sure, keep the 4K REMUX files and play them, blissfully unaware that you can, in fact, compress them down for more efficient storage and transfer and do so while being perceptually identical. Film grain vs digital smooth. Now if I update Plex again it goes back to the buffering issues. Maybe I’m wrong. Life action vs cartoon. We’re talking 4k quality though, so I’m a skeptic. It's a 1:1 copy of the original video file. 1 sound system. Use software to convert the 4k hdr remux to 4k sdr or 1080p. I just want to know if the size of the 4K remux movies are worth it? BluRay is simply the media source. I have an LG CX 65. mkv. Having said that, if you're watching on the 1080p computer there's no reason to go for the 4k version. 4 Atmos system, I started buying 4K UHD discs just in the last month. it is as good of quality as the source contained. So a BluRay release without the 'remux' tag means that the media has been reencoded and there is loss of quality, while 'remux' means it is lossless. Also not all 4k/2k is superior to 1080p if mastered or encoded poorly. The biggest difference between the discs and Disney+ will be bitrate and lossless audio. Just wanted to get people's views on 4K vs 1080p on weather its worth it downloading/ripping 4K media based on the fact there double the size and the majority of releases are not True 4K, It's the only reason I have my cutoffs at 4k HDR rather than a 1080 remux 1080p is the resolution. The good quality + lower space taken up is an attractive option. 4K WEB-DL vs 4K Remux Discussion I want to download DUNE 2 in 4K I found these two versions one is 25 MB/s overall bitrate about 29 GB and the remux is 53 MB/s about 59 GB both are HDR/DV, My TV is Samsung 4k with HDR but not oled Most 4K is upscaled (especially when cgi heavy) from the source anyway so its really the hdr that adds the deep color and contrast to make the pq look far superior to the sdr when done right. High bitrate 1080p will be better than meh bitrate 4k even at h. "Dune" is 1. Filesize doesn't always equate to a better quality, it's a good thing to start looking at, but not the end all be all. they could even be described as just “ok”. I always prefer REMUXES over any encode, anyday. Overall system memory usage was at 14% while transcoding a 4K remux to /tmp. com to check. Any time you re-encode a blu-ray, (which is what a Rip is) you will get some amount of compression artifacts and light banding. My own video camera is a 4k and is 1gb per minute recording. I would say in general I'd trust scene/p2p to make higher quality encoding choices than a streaming service. Reply reply Best 4k encodes vs remux for my setup Hey guys, so I'm setting up my plex server and I've been looking at torrents for 4k movies and I'm wondering what would be best, I dont have tons of storage and I'm seeing remuxes that are a lot of GB obviously then I'm seeing some encodes that are in the 20gb range but I've heard about 'tigole' being great which is quite low GB also. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS 1080p Remux vs 2160p Web Download . Mostly Kodi and I'm playing it via my 3rd gen fire cube. If that remux was from the Blu-ray 3D of Avatar and was properly re-encoded, then yes. 90:1 for about 85 min. It heavily depends on the movie/show. I see no artifacts or anything that would tip me off that I wasn't watching a remux. For me I ended up using a combo of kodi and or jellyfin. A 4K file at low quality will have less information than the 1080p copy. The whole movie in motion, there will be more artifacts. It's based on screen size, distance sitting, and your eyesight. One is the full disc, usually in the format . 480p>720p>1080p>2160p(4k) Remux is an untouched BluRay. Remux means the data has been copied (often simply to a new container like mkv) without any changes. :D remux has the highest Unfortunately I’ve had issues with the pro and miss the roku. A homecinema is connected, this cinema does not support 4K. Remux is short for Remultiplex. The same goes for audio, with Blu-rays offering near-lossless audio quality and a far wider dynamic range Well the shield pro has better specs for sure, even though is more for gaming than streaming, I wish I could afford a Nvidia just to see the performance and how good is the streaming on those devices, I got the 4k Max and regular 4K stick, the cube blows those away, but I keep the 4K to take it ou to friends houses and enjoy some 3 party apps and watch movies. Step 1 is to not download the 4k light junk in your first example. Sure, the Shout special features aren't on the 4K release but you can make your own package by combining discs. With the roku only having a 10/100 port, i know the remux bitrate can sometimes go over 100mb and cause issues. You want to use CPU for the best results. The problem is that 4k takes way longer to download sometimes than 1080, and the GB size can be way bigger. This is most obvious in darker images and color gradients, where compression results in flat textures or banding. If you need Atmos then you need to know that although Atmos is marketed on the ATV, It's only available to streaming apps (Netflix Am I better watching a 4K remux that has standard HDR, Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I have been taking 4k remux, 4k encodes, 1080 remux and 1080 encodes and comparing quality by pixel peeping and watching and comparing while 6 feet away from the tv. Reply reply The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, TechQuickie and other LinusMediaGroup content. However, the reason I am asking this question again on this sub, is because I am specifically interested in whether the difference would be Roku Ultra vs 4K Stick (2021) The (un)official home of #teampixel and the #madebygoogle lineup on Reddit. All I can say is, the 1080p Remux is guaranteed to look good while the 4K WEB-DL will be a hit or miss. I just went from a 1080 priojector to a sony 4k 65 inch tv. Hybrid would solve this issue but until I find that what’s my best option? Archived post. Top. For 4K you’re better off having your server hardwired to the router, or having your 4K content on a HDD if you’re using a Shield. When I started collecting 4K releases, I went down the path of finding which ones are true 4K vs. us bd video, eu bd audio). The standard scenes aren’t much of an upgrade. WEB-DL vs Bluray for 4k HDR content . Works for me. i could be wrong , what is your thought ? I can hear the difference betwen FLAC and 320 Kbps lossy!" Uh huh. Very small sample size though. Those sources would be called remuxs and they are 45-80gb for a 4K remux. Correct. After digging into this subreddit a little though, it seems people are highly against watching such Plex can deliver 4K Blu-ray Rips that are near native Blu-ray quality. The "true" original IMAX format is 1. I’m looking forward to some optimizations for AV1 as We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The IMAX scenes all look amazing on 4k so that’s the biggest reason to upgrade. Which one would yall recommend for the best quality? for me plex streaming for 4K remuxes is so inconsistent even on direct play. The remux in MKV format, is just the video/audio/subtitles ripped from the disc and then put into an mkv container. My tv supports 4k HDR I have already started downloading the REMUX one but I dont see the HDR tag in the title while the other one does have HDR in the title but no REMUX. I have a bunch of 25-50GB 4K movies, but only selected ones I want it great quality. An actual 4k remux — not a transcode, but a remux — will look completely identical provided everything in the chain properly supports the format. The difference between that and Netflix streaming or even ITunes digital movies, was considerable to me. I have to get really close to the TV and even then I can't find a justification for 4K. That's what remux means. WG47 • You have a laptop with a 4k screen, but it can't hardware decode h265? Using FEN and Mad Titan Sports on a firestick 4K Max vs a Gen 2 Cube is night and day. What makes one remux possibly better is source material for video, audio, or a combination thereof. There are more variables than that, such as encoding settings. Reply reply More replies. If you have a Roku TV and your streaming from a Plex app don't bother with 4K remux Dithered down web rips = cheap TV, sound bar setup Common setup but not meant for 4k viewing 4K remux = quality TV, hardwired network connection, good sound etc. I have decided that the quality difference is not worth the increase in space. 1 Atmos track, or just get the Blu-ray release? And let's just assume that ripping the Blu-ray results in the same general bitrate for comparison purposes. The BluRay is the full disc, and the remux is made from that. H. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Hoarder-Setups This comes up a lot for tv shows, Reminder for everyone to buy a 4k blu ray player! Honestly, I can hardly tell a difference between 1080 and 4k. 264 vs. It's not to say that the 4k stream doesn't look good compared to the regular Blu ray but the stream has nothing 99% of the 4K hdr remux copies are hdr10. But would it make more sense to grab the Web-DL of movies like this and remux with the better TrueHD 7. in IMAX. . A remux is a direct extract from the source. BTW, Avatar 2 due out end of this year is all 1. As alternative, I can download the Web-DL with DD+ Atmos. Disk space is cheap compared to the CPU to transcode it offline. If you have a solid tv and a great sounbar, you could use the REMUX. Best. Indeed, on my current 55" 4k Samsung TV, I can't see a difference at ~7ft, so I just go for the encodes. Universal kept those for themselves. Disc > digital! Some torrented files are full 4K Bluray quality, others are compressed down. com) basically recommends bitrates of 20 Mbps or higher to get better than streaming quality but I've found that a lot of streaming movie content is at this level or slightly higher now. Shouldn't matter. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS 4K HDR Blu Ray remux 43,6 GB vs 4K HDR 10+ BluRay rip 5,39 GB? I just ordered an LG C2 and I want to get The Batman in 4K, as all those dark scenes should look amazing on the OLED panel. And yes, BT. x265 is an encoded 4K BluRay. The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, TechQuickie and other LinusMediaGroup content. I know generally the answer is obvious on which one is better, but there have been some bad 4K releases. The only difference would be if author left out audio tracks and subtitles from the remux. Which would still amount to ~550GB of space Web-DL has - Worse image quality than 4k Remux What I've started doing is having the remux until I watch the movie for the first time then deciding if I want to downgrade for archiving. But apples to apples, it would then depend on how you watch the content. and 1. The question of if rips can be truly lossless and translate to the typical television set in the same way as a 4K disc in a Blu-ray player plugged into a 4K TV is something that continues to be unanswered I think. I've tried about everything and I still can't manage to play any 4K movie without stuttering (4K TV, speed 300mbps, and so on). Should a buy a 4K Bluray player to read physical discs or keep using my apple tv 4k setup ? Just to know : I have an Apple TV 4k that I use to stream my content with infuse wia my plex library. There are limitations with Dolby Vision around the audio tracks and being multiple layers that make it difficult to consume unless you have specific players like an new lg tv. A multiplex is a stream or file that has multiple other files or streams contained within it. My personal experience You mean Fire TV Stick 4K (2018)? well you can see all the differences between them here. I only have watched the show on HBO Max never in physical form. So a BluRay release without the 'remux' tag means that the media has been REMUX strips a lot of extra data and repacks it to save space, the core movie and audio tracks are intact, but that's about it. Gaming. But how different is that from a Web-DL as you'd think a direct download of a file would still be the best. Can people really tell the difference between a 25 gb digital movie and the same film remux at 50gb+? Either 4K remux rips, or terrible VHS rips from 30 years ago. Maybe if I did stills but who knows. x264 and x265 are not codecs, they're libraries used to encode to a codec (h264 or h265). 2. But in 4K TVs with atleast 50" screen size is QXR the better choice or the difference wouldn't be that big? (Let's say While I also prefer high bitrate bluray remux, I'll always prefer a hdr 4k to a sdr bluray when available. ailee43 This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. Setup is 85” QN90A & Denon X2200 7. At least with my video setup. I dint mention it to them I also hid which of the files was the remux vs the encode. H265 is 18. I want to know if the difference between a remux file and a rip is Shop Collectible Avatars; Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I have "40 LED Full HD tv. (also, in that case the audio track seems to be exactly the same) 4K remux mkv vs 4K bluray Question Hello, Has anyone compared playing a 4K remux mkv file ( 60-80 gb ) played We're now read-only indefinitely due to Reddit Incorporated's poor management and decisions related to third party platforms and content management. Good encodes (DON, SbR, etc) you will not notice the difference between the remux and the encode. GPU's have encoders that are designed specifically to do decoding and encoding fast at the expense of quality and compression efficiency. Depends on the film. Obviously you can rip it in much higher bitrates or just remux. I didn't say that that, either. Busy content or not. The hybrid then refers to different media sources (web vs bd) rather than different editions of the same type of media source (e. Example I can't play 4k on one of my televisions but if I uninstalled all Plex updates and go back to the default that was installed on the shield 4K playback works just fine. Come and join us today! Scene encodes tend to be fairly small compared to the complete BD, at the cost of some quality loss. VLC has always been known to have hdr issues, which might be your problem, provided once again we’re talking about an actual remux. Edit: thanks for the input, everyone. In movies, PSA 1080p is around 2-4GB while QXR Tigole 1080p is around 4-9GB, In 1080p display, you can't see the difference. Right now, I use torrent to download 4k content (movies/tv), and generally the REMUX version is the best. those guys take forever and pay attention to the easy stuff like banding and artifacts looking for "transparent" encodes. 4K vs 1080p is a factor only you can decide. a high quality encode. The difference will vary between the movies (as expected). 1080p can be upscaled to 4K by turning each 1x1 pixel into 2x2 pixels because 1080p is exactly 1/4th the size and proportions of 4K. But when it comes to 4K, things (mainly storage) start to change your perspective. I've learned that I don't have to have a remux only mentality. The comparison between 1080p Blu-ray and 4K/HDR streaming gets even murkier thanks to Disney+ with their low effort HDR conversions of older movies. Watching tv from 2-2,5 m distance in my room. Or check it out in the app stores Best 4K REMUX Release Groups? See the recent Love Actually 2160p REMUX release from FraMeSToR vs CiNEPHiLES as an example. 43:1 for about 70 min. I did have to go hardwire vs wifi because my wifi is not stable enough to play 100gb remux files. 43:1 digital 4K IMAX movies. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS. That's 1 frame still. WEB. I believe they went all out on bonus features back when they did the Ultimate Editions, and the same bonus disc from those is in the current 2-Disc All are upgrades PQ and some in audio (ATMOS). A remux will be the highest quality possible, and as you guessed, won't saturate a gigabit line (most 4K remuxes average between 50 and 70Mbps, with peaks that might get into the 200s for very short amounts of time). I’ve considered saving space and sanity and just going for 4K x265 encodes and using the roku again, but can’t find much information on bitrate size vs the remux 4K. The only time I'm getting 4K is if a movie I like has been remastered in 4K and haven't got a 1080p blu-ray release, which is rare. Both are 4k, both are the same duration. It is not encoded A remux is definitely encoded. And let's compare a fire stick 4K Max to an Nvidia Shield Pro, and the fire stick does not even come close. New. I always thought encodes are compressed versions of the remux, but I have been reading that 4K encodes are not noticeable from 4K remuxes. Quality wise there is no much difference to notice between remux and a Blu-ray. 4K Remux vs Blu Ray Disk . Nothing in between! Seriously though, ~8GB 1080p movies are the sweet spot for me. The other series was Attack on Titan although in still images you could tell some difference nothing major what push people towards remux video (again without knowing which is which) was during the action scenes in the show. So you keep all the original information. 1080p remux is 30 gig. From here, it was split ROUGHLY down the middle with half of folks telling me the 1080p Remux copies were the best while the other half said the 1080p bluray rips were better. 78:1 (16:9) in IMAX. Hybrids are the best, but that’s because they are multisourced. Get support, learn new information, and hang out in the subreddit dedicated to Pixel, Nest, Chromecast, the Assistant, and a few more things from Google. All the same shade. Also keep in mind that sometimes files have to be encoded a certain way depending on the device you're playing back on (For example, playing back an mkv directly on an LG OLED requires DTS audio and Dolby Vision video to be remuxed to play correctly) For 4k remux movies, which will easily be 50GB+, there's only two things the speed difference will have an impact on: The time it takes for the drive to seek to that file (worst case, you'll have to wait an additional second for the movie to start playing) Yeah it's great, download a remux and a high quality encode and compare for yourself. This allows me to play DV and Atmos (lossless). This also gets files much easier to play over wifi networks. If I paused it on my 70” TV, and inspected a specific scene with all 3 Has anyone noticed the difference in quality when say watching a 4K Rip direct through tv’s USB or through client with Kodi/Plex, as opposed to a 4K UHD disc through a high With 1080p REMUX 25. The Blu-ray itself is already (almost always) a loss of quality from the original source recording, so I don't see the point in storing a 20 - 50 GB file when an 8 - 15 GB file will rival the quality at Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I watch on an OLED as well in a home theater setup. Just what those terms loosely mean. On the go I don't really see a difference ce between the built in app vs the one on the shield. g. Filesize: Remux = 1GB vs. I personally would always prefer a 1080p blu-ray remux over a 4k Rip. 39 GB, while the same movie in 2160p. The only 3D ISO I see is over 45gb. In this case the x265 means the person reencoded the remux, Hi I currently have a server with around 20TB storage and want to upgrade some of my movies to 4K but want the quality to be great, I have a 55 inch 4K samsung tv and usually sit about 5-7 feet away from it. There's also a lot of P2P groups that aim for transparency, i. After reading reviews I decided on balance it wouldn’t look significantly different to be worth spending £45. Checking dark frames, and motion frames too and don't see a difference in detail. So that video file, while 4k in resolution, can be tiny. Remux = Remux. Also consider what are you watching it on? How far away from the screen are you? Look at a size-vs-distance chart, for example if you are on a sofa 10ft away from a 65" TV the average person can't tell a difference between 1080P and 4K anyways. Or check it out in the app stores Web-DL 30GB vs Remux HDR 69GB. etc etc. I used to reencode my blue rays now I leave them as remux and my 4k I always try to keep remux You do notice a difference. 43:1 (either 70mm film or 4K IMAX with Laser). And if you are going to inspect it, please don't do it on an Iphone or Laptop or Computer monitor and say there is no difference. The smaller Bluray rips use the remux files which are then re-encoded to a smaller size. Remux is just like shedded version on Blu-ray,scraping extras and audios nothiing different Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Why are the HDR movies much smaller than Remux? Is there a loss of A/V quality? The Nvidia tube is not that good compared to the PRO. 2160p WEB-DL > 1080p remux, imo. The Nvidia Shield Pro handles ALL direct play audio far better and has an extremely good AI 4K upscaling for those serious about high-end video. One thing to consider would be that 4K is usually "encoded" in 10 bit colour range meaning it can have 4x the colour range of 8 bit, 256 colours vs 1024 colours. Or check it out in the app stores Remux vs encoded 4k movies? Which one is better for performance ? Question Open comment sort options. I'm using a HTPC for several years now. Just not *re-*encoded by a third party. Hope this helps you. It is not reencoded compared to the bluray, its the same thing but as an mkv. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app What I'm wondering is is there enough of a quality difference between a 4K ultra HD Blu-ray with Dolby vision versus purchasing a Pacific Rim, Dark Knight, etc, I decided to make the move off of 4k remux to iTunes. Remux movie is 49. I think most would Since I have a 83” A90J OLED and a 7. I know that downloading a 4k uhd disc or remux is the best quality. I was wondering, is there much of a difference between let's say a 70gb remux compared to something like a decent 20-30gb encoded bluray rip? Is it really worth the extra space these files take up when viewed on a nice big screen, or is there a point of diminishing returns if the encode is good enough? also forgive me if this question has been asked a lot, I'm just interested in Plex can play 4K remixes no problem but they really screwed something up with the latest updates. The one issue I had woth DV on the TV app using plex, is that th TV NIC interface is limited to 100mbps, which many streams from plex (rips or downloaded content) at 4k woth DV and Atmos can blow past that number in bits per second. I have a 4K TV. You might not be able to see a difference unless you’re really looking. a complete 1to1 ripped from a BluRay that hasn't been reencoded. Only difference should be the amount of audio and subtitle tracks. Now, imagine that we just have a plain blue frame. Would the quality of a 4K Blu ray played through a Blu Ray Player connected to a Receiver be better than a 4k Remux file played on an Nvidia Shield View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. That being said, these REMUX Rips on Plex are right there. However, I was wondering if there is a noticeable difference between a Bluray I have a 55inch 4k HDR TV I never tried remux torrents, because it takes too much time to download. Controversial. 1080 is typically easy to stream over Wi-Fi, but you may have issues with 4K. From what I understand though, Loki was filmed for 4K, so the physical release should be better than the Blu-Ray, right? I have a 4TB hard drive that I just filled up with a bunch of Tigole's 4k HDR HEVC files since all his bluray rips were so good (and those included commentaries and extras). I acknowledge that others want the best of the best but I've had zero issues with what I'm watching. A remux is a remux. I didn't want a fragmented library in terms of resolution, so I tested, asked the industry experts, and settled on 2560. If it's 4k, MA / amazon VOD then 4k framestor / wildcat remux, no 4k encodes for me. Remux will be purely movie and nothing shit. they're just upscaled (you can go on blu-ray . Try to find the difference and see if that is worth it. As for the HDR part, both use HDR (as you said) so your theather set-up must be able to handle it. Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog r/Piracy • by Jakjak81. Or 1080p remux vs 2160p blu ray . Or check it out in the app stores BluRay 2160p REMUX bit rate: 46. I’m finding more and more shows stream in 4k but are only released physically as a 1080p blu rays. Same with 4K REMUX and compressed versions. 4K Blu-rays also benefit from greater color resolution which would be more obvious with the linework and sharp color edges of some animation, so that might be worth upgrading for as well, and Honestly I've rarely seen a difference in a remux vs. There's no such thing as what you see in movies that "enhance" pictures or movies that were already blurry. I would go for the REMUX, maybe delete some after, or buy extra storage. Valheim; Genshin Impact; is there different in quality watching 4k between 4k remux and 4k Disc Player in 4k tv any worth different in quality to buy the player and the discs like OPPO players I can't even see the difference from 4K remux and 1080p remux on a 65 inch sitting from my couch. There is absolutely no difference between proper size encodes. How much "better" is the quality of Disney 4k remux with DV HDR vs the pirated complete 4kUHD (no DV) Are there any side-by-side comparisons? I understand there are also a few factors at play here (like the type of tv you have Generally, using a GPU to handle conversions of permanent files is frowned upon. Remux means the data has been copied (often simply to a new container like mkv) without any changes. If storage space is a concern then you should probably skip remuxes and grab encodes. Get the Reddit app Scan this 4K Remux - EPSiLON vs. That's not a remux, but is an encode. I don't regret spending the premium on the 4K copy, because these are some of the greatest films ever made, so I don't mind owning them in the highest quality, even if the difference is literally maybe 5% at best. It will have slightly more detail at times compared to a Blu-ray. Its compressed you still get 4K definition and high-quality audio—you do lose some detail compared to a 4K Blu-ray. Xbox Series S 4k Remux vs Shield . Honestly I've rarely seen a difference in a 4k remux vs. FraMeSToR? Question Best. Nearly everyone agreed that the 4K remux and 1080p remux versions looked identical. There is no difference. 5mb/s and 4K WEB-DL 14. For example I watched thor ragnarok from a lossless remux vs his encode (just testing) on a 55 4k tv and honestly at where i was setting i couldn't notice a difference. This is 7GB/Ep. 01000110010110012 • • Edited . 2020 is HDR. Not many IMAX theaters can show 1.
nxotrkp bspg oitqc mhgw faqt qphbo giqq ftece mxhqb ayhmhdxo