Awaiting reviewer selection after minor revision. You can register for free here: Peer Review Excellence.
Awaiting reviewer selection after minor revision It is just guessing. After making revisions according to the I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. 04 - Accepted directly. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". However, If the required changes were very minimal (e. Role of the journal editor. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 4 Accept with Minor Revision. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. 2022. Minor revisions Major revisions It is very unusual for a paper to be accepted without needing any revisions. Also, you seem to have brought up several points. The Editor will take into I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. This change has occurred Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. The five allowable Editorial decisions are: You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". I made the revision and resubmitted in the last week of November 2020. The reviewing process starts when editors send the paper to the first suitable reviewer, and ends when final review is complete. Comments to Authors helps the authors improve their The result of the first round of peer review was ‘major revision’ and the result of the second round was ‘minor revision’ and all reviewers report form is “YES (x)” Currently, my revised manuscript is in the ‘Pending Decision (almost 3 days)’ As the second round was completed rapidly, I assumed the ‘Pending Decision’ would The reviewers will come up with comments and ultimately the editor may approve, reject, , or more commonly ask for revision (major/minor). After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. Then I revised and resubmitted. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" after a month. Recruiting new reviewers to evaluate a 3) Minor Revision. However, expect a slightly longer wait at this time of the year due to the approaching For manuscripts you don’t expect to see a revision. After It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. The Editor will determine if additional input is needed from reviewers. To request extensions for revisions. In case one happened before the other, that could help clarify the The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. If only one reviewer agrees to review and all the others After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Around the end of last year, the journal changed its chief editor who was responsible for my article. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. In general, a paper is recommended for minor revision when all reviews are either accept or minor revision. The article contains a small number of easily correctable errors including grammar, missing ref-erences, and minor content clarification. 4) Not Suitable for Publication. e. In the first notification, I got a major revision. Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . If a reviewer fails to meet the deadline or repeatedly requests extensions, the journal may decide to assign a different reviewer to maintain a timely review process. if the manuscript needs to be sent After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Possible reasons for the need of a new reviewer could be After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. Is it a bad sign? I received a decision of ‘accept after minor revision’ for my submission to a Springer Nature journal. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but In the case of a Revision decision, it would also include your view of essential enhancements the authors must make or any other particular issues related to the paper. It was updated to ‘Under Review’ on December 10, 2020, and has remained so till date. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. I just thought after all reviewer scores, getting the editor decision I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. This I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). What does "Awaiting Assignment to Batch" mean? Hot Network Questions Help Locate Bathroom Vent Leak Entries in center but right-aligned in tabularray Does identity theory “solve” the hard problem of consciousness? But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". 3. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. The AE will check if all the comments are addressed. The Editor will take into The third reviewer did not provide any comments but gave 9 suggestions. What to do for a The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Usually, it is not a single reviewer, but several reviewers. The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 3. For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". Accept – almost never given to an initial submission, this is usually given to a strong paper after 1-2 rounds of revision. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. มีข้อแก้ไขเล็กน้อย (minor revisionหรือ revision required) บรรณาธิการแจ้งผลหลังจาก ผู้ประเมินพิจารณาบทความเรียบร้อยแล้ว (ประมาณ 1 – 2 เดือน) 3. Basics of Peer Review; Responding to Peer Reviewers; Tracking Your Submission. Should I wait for them or write to them? Please suggest. From some previous posts I assume that such The response letter to the reviewer’ comments and the revised manuscript have been sent to the reviewer. Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. and later got a decision of major revision. If the initial revision was a minor revision, the status usually changes to ‘With Editor’ or ‘Decision in Progress’. Unfortunately, some reviewers might reject to review the paper for various reasons. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. g. Also, ‘SAE’ perhaps stands for ‘Specialist Associate Editor. The status stayed "with the editor" for around 4 months and suddenly, I get a rejection for my 9 November 2024. Then I received a reject letter from the new editor. reviewer selection system, making it more likely that you will be selected to review. Get clarity on reviewer In that case, maybe it is not the policy of the journal to state clearly whether the submission will be sent out for review or not. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Now for the last • Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. This means that the submission needs some minor work (as recommended by the reviewer) but that once it has been revised it will be accepted for publication. When a revised paper is received: Minor changes will usually be assessed directly by the editor; If significant revisions were requested, the editor will usually return the manuscript to the original reviewers (unless they opted out of this) Rarely, the editor may invite comments from a new reviewer – the editor should explain why this fresh After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. It does not offer any value to the readers of IEEE Potentials or its subject is so thoroughly incoher- I have an experience of getting two minor revisions and finally article was rejected, othe other hand another article was accepted after major revision. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, although there is the option to add new reviewers (if additional input is needed), or drop some (for example, if they were entirely satisfied with the previous version). From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. I made all the required amendments and submit again. Choose Major Revision if a paper has real potential, but a large component should be redone and re-reviewed. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. What can this mean? The platform is are invited to revise and resubmit your article (see decision notification e-mails and what they mean, below). ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. Awaiting Editor Decision. Responding to Peer Reviewers. I believe that I have adequately addressed the concerns raised by the Reviewer and made significant improvements to the manuscript. This change has occurred Review and selection of manuscripts. This change Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I for example look at my assignments once a week. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". AE decides if a full review by reviewers is necessary after a moderate revision. What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather straightforward"? 0. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. In the second-round review after major revisions, as informed by the assistant editor, the reviewer agreed for the first and second-round reviews didn’t submit the second-round review report in a period of nearly two weeks, which is quite rare based on our experience. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). Choose 'Editor Center' and then click on 'Awaiting Referee Selection' C. A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. One reviewer suggested to accepts it as is, the second didn't give a response. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent back to the reviewers. At the third day, I saw Awaiting EE Decision which is still there. The article is not suitable for publication. Resubmitting a Manuscript to the Same Journal after Being Plainly Rejected. It was rather an easy comment, so I resubmitted the case report after revision immediately. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". The academic editor can select from the following options: accept in its current form, accept with minor revisions, reject and decline resubmission, reject but encourage resubmission, ask the author for Some aspects of your question were not clear. However, I have heard nothing from the journal for 3 weeks, though I assumed I would receive a response in a few days. Again, the two statuses occurring together is surprising. Preprint got published on Authorea without sending it to review (desk rejection). If you recommend acceptance, provide detail justifying However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. The editor, considering the reviewers' comments and their own thoughts, provided 12 suggestions and believed that the paper could be accepted after minor revisions. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Questions Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. In most cases, the revised manuscript will be re-assigned to the original Editor. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. The journal clearly said that the paper was accepted, subject to minor amendments and even went on to mention tentative publication dates. All the reviewers overall appreciated the content and the usefulness, but also suggested corrections (varying from minor to As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. If indeed there is good evidence that the paper can be published after a relatively minor revision, With revised manuscripts, usually the reviewers from the previous round are selected. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. Accept with minor revisions: Also known as conditional acceptance, this decision means that the paper requires minor changes for it to be accepted. The submission is now with the author. If you intend for the reviewers to verify the revisions, you should NOT choose It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. At least one reviewer recommends “Accept after minor revision (no further review)”, and no “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision” or “Reject” is recommended. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. In the case of major revisions, the manuscript The manuscript is promising but needs major revisions and, in the judgment of the reviewer, may be unacceptable depending on the responses of the authors to the review. 18 As a rule of thumb, minor revision leads to a quick acceptance, usually without sending the paper back to reviewers; however, this depends on how well the editor does his/her job and My case report, which was edited by Editage, received a minor revision request by a journal. The status of the paper changed several times. Can I send a email to AE? A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). So we sent query to the editor. In any case, the current status “With Editor” means that the editor is taking another look at your paper. Q: How can I decide whether my suspicion is correct? What handling times I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. Editorial policies or practices: I recently received the reviews/comments for an article submitted few months back to a journal. Cite Fausto Alfredo Canales I had a revision decision, and after I submitted the revision, the status went to "Under review", and after about 4 weeks, it has now changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores". Months later I received a "Minor Revision". My paper underwent a revision. Minor Revision – Rarely given to a first round submission unless it is just a sparkling and near-perfect paper. If AE would like to recommend for a minor revision when a manuscript still has a major For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. A sudden change of status could also mean that the Associate Editor is facing challenges in I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. What could be Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. Bottom line, it's all depends how well you respond to reviewer comments and how much reviewer and editor get satisfy with your revised version. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. Is it common for a journal to reject a paper after previously accepting it? When a paper of mine was first reviewed, one of the reviewers was okay with the paper and the other one requested minor revisions. similar reviews from two different accounts for the same manuscript) What happens when you receive the decision letter? After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. ’ My article was submitted to a journal last year and has undergone three rounds of reviews. Hi. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. Good Luck! I submitted my paper to a journal twelve days ago. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. My first round of review went well, with one reviewer only suggesting stylistic improvements Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors; Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. , choice of language, punctuation), it is likely that the editor will make the final decision. Paper under review a second time without After 5 months I received a "Major revision". In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. B. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. Positive review from an additional (third) reviewer (endorsing the 2nd reviewer) against a negative review from the 1st reviewer. The suitability of the selected reviewers; The adequacy of reviewer comments and author response; The overall scientific quality of the paper. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is accepted. " Does it mean that my paper will go through The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). What does ” awaiting reviewer selection ” mean under ” minor revision “? There is a contradiction in your statements. Pub-Express I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. How long do I need to wait to get the result? Thanks! The Journal response: Major revision -> minor revision "Revise for Editor Only'' -> reject. Instances of this decision are also rather rare. We suggest 30 days for minor revisions and 90 days to resubmit for major revisions. This change has occurred After that, if the reviewer accepts your revision, he/she will recommend your manuscript for publication by submitting his comment to editor confidentially while when he didn't accept your If accepted, the paper is sent to production. Revisions Authors who receive a decision of Minor Revision or Major Revision have 20, and 40 days, respectively, to resubmit the revised manuscript. 03 - Submitted a revised version with 31 pages of revision comments. So, let me first summarize the situation. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor revisions". We have our manuscript reviewed by journal Forests. If the initial revision was a major revision, there may be another round of major/minor revision requested on resubmission. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. This change has occurred After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point-by-point It is not uncommon for reviewers to have differing opinions and it is up to the Editor to make a final decision on your manuscript based on the reviewers’ opinions and the revisions you have made. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). A minor revision is close to a contract to publish the paper if certain changes are made. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. Thank you. Then the status changed to “Decision in process”. Based on this, it may take about two-three weeks for this round of review and for the final decision. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. 5. This change has occurred For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. The editor sent the manuscript to a third reviewer who suggested rejection with very negative comments in everything. Note that the time it takes for an editor to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. revision again. However you can make it clear that the paper is likely to be accepted in the future. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Minor Revision - A Minor revision should only be used for papers that have a clear contribution, and there are only small changes that need to be made to make the paper ready What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 2. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. " Does this I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. Awaiting Reviewer Scores. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. Kindly let me know what the above status message means. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. after a 2nd revision) may not require any editorial summary. You can register for free here: Peer Review Excellence. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. This change has occurred At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 12 Publication dates: accepted date, version of record online, issue online – which one to use? Latest Articles. After contacting Meaning of Awaiting Approval/Editing Checklist status after submitting for a minor revision I have submitted my paper after making the minor revisions. I want to know how long will this status last. I am I submitted an article to an emerald journal a month ago and 4 days back, I received a decision mail stating this, 'The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some minor revisions to your manuscript. The majority of articles require revision before reaching this stage. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and expertise). Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. There are three basic types like what @Eppicurt said, it's hard to tell without knowing the details, but if after the first round of review, the verdict is "minor revision", and you've done what the reviewers suggested, then I would say it has a good chance of being accepted (this is from my own experience both as author and reviewer, but NOT in biology field), worst case you probably I submitted my manuscript to a journal. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". example of cover page for assignment; how to write a cover letter for delivery driver; to do or make a speech; what does assignment mean in education; explaining Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting . There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. For the first round, I recieved a major revision and for the next two rounds, I received minor revisions. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days The process of reviewer selection in S1M is quite straightforward. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers If the evaluations require major revisions and the paper has been The revision can be minor, moderate, or major, and this is usually indicated in the decision letter and/or the manuscript status in the submission system. After a reviewer has been invited, the reviewer needs to accept/decline the invitation. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 3. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. For It is not uncommon for a journal to invite new reviewers after a manuscript has been submitted with minor revisions. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. The manuscript is publishable in its current form. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Minor Revision - A limited number of changes are required. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural Reviewers should not recommend citations of their own papers without sufficient explanation as to why the work is relevant; Be aware of any rapid or short reviews that recommend acceptance or minor revision without detail; You should also look out for duplicate reviews (i. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. " A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. Comments: You seem to have received comments from two reviewers, one for a minor revision and the other for a major revision. It is usual for a paper to go through at least two author revisions before acceptance. . Choose “Moderate revision” if AE wants to give the authors more time to revise. When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of peer review; usually, the editor goes through the revisions and Sometimes, reviewers may become unavailable due to unforeseen circumstances, such as illness, heavy workload, or other commitments. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? I am not sure if the initial revision requested was a major revision or a minor revision. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. In Manuscript Central, there were some changes of the paper’s status during the first two days, and as far as I can remember, these were Awaiting ADM Processing and Awaiting technical editor selection. The one exception is that accepting a paper after just minor revisions (e. Should I reach out, or continue waiting? Thank your Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. However, today, Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. 4. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. If the paper was sent back for revision, the Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. It has been three weeks since. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. Is Is it normal to have the status "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" pop up a day or two after submitting a minor revision? My understanding was that once a minor revision was submitted the paper would not go out for further peer-review? This is a journal using the ScholarOne system. Reviewers On most of the Society’s journals, I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. When a manuscript is listed as "In reviewer agreement" in a journal's status, it means that the reviewer or reviewers who have been assigned to the manuscript are Dears I submitted a paper, after 4 months I received major revisions from 2 reviewers. Among other reasons, this could be due to the field of study – perhaps it’s niche/super-specialized, interdisciplinary 2. Implies that the editors and reviewers feel the paper is publishable once their comments have been addressed. A major revision was submitted to a journal. So, there is a conflict between the two reviewers regarding the number Decision Types Accept - No further revision required. Sample reviewer comments: One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. So, I have edited it for clarity. I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under review to ensure that you have actually responded Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Choose “Minor revision” If reviewers are no longer required and AE wants to QC some key revisions. The editor may also decide that certain or all reviewers need not see the manuscript again, as their comments have been adequately addressed, or However, it was under review for 5 months. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. If the reviewer feels that ratings of novelty and importance will not improve even if the manuscript is adequately revised, the decision should be Reject, not Major Revision Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. jqyqnycoywbpjaugfadvnqmjhhsosqhhuogvejkjoggzffgvzcpg